
Abstract Background A lack of reproducibility has been repeatedly criticized in computational research. High throughput sequencing (HTS) data analysis is a complex multi-step process. For most of the steps a range of bioinformatic tools is available and for most tools manifold parameters need to be set. Due to this complexity, HTS data analysis is particularly prone to reproducibility and consistency issues. We have defined four criteria that in our opinion ensure a minimal degree of reproducible research for HTS data analysis. A series of workflow management systems is available for assisting complex multi-step data analyses. However, to the best of our knowledge, none of the currently available work flow management systems satisfies all four criteria for reproducible HTS analysis. Results Here we present uap , a workflow management system dedicated to robust, consistent, and reproducible HTS data analysis. uap is optimized for the application to omics data, but can be easily extended to other complex analyses. It is available under the GNU GPL v3 license at https://github.com/yigbt/uap . Conclusions uap is a freely available tool that enables researchers to easily adhere to reproducible research principles for HTS data analyses.
Data Analysis, Genome, QH301-705.5, Work-flow management, Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics, R858-859.7, Computational Biology, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Reproducibility of Results, Reproducible research, Sequencing data analysis, Biology (General), Transcriptome, Algorithms, Software
Data Analysis, Genome, QH301-705.5, Work-flow management, Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics, R858-859.7, Computational Biology, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Reproducibility of Results, Reproducible research, Sequencing data analysis, Biology (General), Transcriptome, Algorithms, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
