
Abstract The development of new drugs is costly, time consuming, and often accompanied with safety issues. Drug repurposing can avoid the expensive and lengthy process of drug development by finding new uses for already approved drugs. In order to repurpose drugs effectively, it is useful to know which proteins are targeted by which drugs. Computational models that estimate the interaction strength of new drug--target pairs have the potential to expedite drug repurposing. Several models have been proposed for this task. However, these models represent the drugs as strings, which is not a natural way to represent molecules. We propose a new model called GraphDTA that represents drugs as graphs and uses graph neural networks to predict drug--target affinity. We show that graph neural networks not only predict drug--target affinity better than non-deep learning models, but also outperform competing deep learning methods. Our results confirm that deep learning models are appropriate for drug--target binding affinity prediction, and that representing drugs as graphs can lead to further improvements. Availability of data and materials The proposed models are implemented in Python. Related data, pre-trained models, and source code are publicly available at https://github.com/thinng/GraphDTA . All scripts and data needed to reproduce the post-hoc statistical analysis are available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3603523 . Contact Thin.Nguyen@deakin.edu.au
software, Drug Repositioning, Proteins, drug repositioning, pharmaceutical preparations, neural networks, proteins, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Neural Networks, Computer, Software
software, Drug Repositioning, Proteins, drug repositioning, pharmaceutical preparations, neural networks, proteins, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Neural Networks, Computer, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 980 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
