
AbstractT cells use their T-cell receptors (TCRs) to discriminate between lower-affinity self and higher affinity non-self pMHC antigens. Although the discriminatory power of the TCR is widely believed to be near-perfect, technical difficulties have hampered efforts to precisely quantify it. Here, we describe a method for measuring very low TCR/pMHC affinities, and use it to measure the discriminatory power of the TCR, and the factors affecting it. We find that TCR discrimination, although enhanced compared with conventional cell-surface receptors, is imperfect: primary human T cells can respond to pMHC with affinities as low as KD~1 mM. The kinetic proofreading mechanism fit our data, providing the first estimates of both the time delay (2.8 s) and number of biochemical steps (2.67) that are consistent with the extraordinary sensitivity of antigen recognition. Our findings explain why self pMHC frequently induce autoimmune diseases and anti-tumour responses, and suggest ways to modify TCR discrimination.
QH301-705.5, Science, Q, T cells, R, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Antigen-Antibody Complex, Surface Plasmon Resonance, Major Histocompatibility Complex, antigen discrimination, Medicine, Humans, T cell receptor, co-signalling receptors, Biology (General), Peptides, kinetic proofreading, mathematical model, Computational and Systems Biology
QH301-705.5, Science, Q, T cells, R, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Antigen-Antibody Complex, Surface Plasmon Resonance, Major Histocompatibility Complex, antigen discrimination, Medicine, Humans, T cell receptor, co-signalling receptors, Biology (General), Peptides, kinetic proofreading, mathematical model, Computational and Systems Biology
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 52 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
