
pmid: 29518076
pmc: PMC5843167
Summary Passive acoustic sensing has emerged as a powerful tool for quantifying anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity, especially for echolocating bat species. To better assess bat population trends there is a critical need for accurate, reliable, and open source tools that allow the detection and classification of bat calls in large collections of audio recordings. The majority of existing tools are commercial or have focused on the species classification task, neglecting the important problem of first localizing echolocation calls in audio which is particularly problematic in noisy recordings. We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) based open-source pipeline for detecting ultrasonic, full-spectrum, search-phase calls produced by echolocating bats (BatDetect). Our deep learning algorithms (CNN FULL and CNN FAST ) were trained on full-spectrum ultrasonic audio collected along road-transects across Romania and Bulgaria by citizen scientists as part of the iBats programme and labelled by users of www.batdetective.org . We compared the performance of our system to other algorithms and commercial systems on expert verified test datasets recorded from different sensors and countries. As an example application, we ran our detection pipeline on iBats monitoring data collected over five years from Jersey (UK), and compared results to a widely-used commercial system. Here, we show that both CNN FULL and CNN FAST deep learning algorithms have a higher detection performance (average precision, and recall) of search-phase echolocation calls with our test sets, when compared to other existing algorithms and commercial systems tested. Precision scores for commercial systems were reasonably good across all test datasets (>0.7), but this was at the expense of recall rates. In particular, our deep learning approaches were better at detecting calls in road-transect data, which contained more noisy recordings. Our comparison of CNN FULL and CNN FAST algorithms was favourable, although CNN FAST had a slightly poorer performance, displaying a trade-off between speed and accuracy. Our example monitoring application demonstrated that our open-source, fully automatic, BatDetect CNN FAST pipeline does as well or better compared to a commercial system with manual verification previously used to analyse monitoring data. We show that it is possible to both accurately and automatically detect bat search-phase echolocation calls, particularly from noisy audio recordings. Our detection pipeline enables the automatic detection and monitoring of bat populations, and further facilitates their use as indicator species on a large scale, particularly when combined with automatic species identification. We release our system and datasets to encourage future progress and transparency.
570, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, INFORMATION, Bioinformatics, QH301-705.5, ECHOLOCATION CALLS, Biochemical Research Methods, CLASSIFICATION, Machine Learning, CITIZEN SCIENCE, Computer-Assisted, Chiroptera, Animals, Biology (General), SPEECH RECOGNITION, 01 Mathematical Sciences, 08 Information And Computing Sciences, Science & Technology, Endangered Species, 500, Computational Biology, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neural Networks (Computer), 06 Biological Sciences, MONITORING PROGRAM, ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS, Echolocation, Signal Processing, POPULATIONS, BIODIVERSITY, Mathematical & Computational Biology, Neural Networks, Computer, AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Zoology, Algorithms, Research Article, Environmental Monitoring
570, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, INFORMATION, Bioinformatics, QH301-705.5, ECHOLOCATION CALLS, Biochemical Research Methods, CLASSIFICATION, Machine Learning, CITIZEN SCIENCE, Computer-Assisted, Chiroptera, Animals, Biology (General), SPEECH RECOGNITION, 01 Mathematical Sciences, 08 Information And Computing Sciences, Science & Technology, Endangered Species, 500, Computational Biology, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neural Networks (Computer), 06 Biological Sciences, MONITORING PROGRAM, ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS, Echolocation, Signal Processing, POPULATIONS, BIODIVERSITY, Mathematical & Computational Biology, Neural Networks, Computer, AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Zoology, Algorithms, Research Article, Environmental Monitoring
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 172 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
