Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

What’s in a song? Female bushcrickets discriminate against the song of older males

Authors: Ritchie, M.; Couzin, I.; Snedden, W.;

What’s in a song? Female bushcrickets discriminate against the song of older males

Abstract

The striking songs of insects such as bushcrickets have traditionally been interpreted as species recognition signals. If this is so, their information content should be relatively simple. Females should discriminate against atypical songs, but not between common differences between males. Alternatively, female preference may have evolved by sexual selection with variation between males providing reliable cues on which females discriminate among potential mates, or sensory biases may predispose females towards a particular form of song. We examined how the calling song of the bushcricket Ephippiger ephippiger varies in natural populations. Song structure changes over the course of a season, reflecting wear of the stridulatory apparatus. Males vary substantially in the rate at which they show ageing effects. Superimposed on this are consistent differences between males and temperature effects. This sexual signal therefore contains potentially reliable cues which females could use during mate choice. When presented with artificial songs that reproduce some of the song variants associated with older males, females show extremely strong preferences for unmanipulated song, typical of young males. These aspects of female preference will exert sexual selection on males, whether they originate for adaptive or arbitrary reasons.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    50
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
50
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!