
pmid: 7630897
In this paper we examine the explanations for local species diversity. Using six extensive data-sets for drosophilid flies (which include both temperate and tropical species) we compare three major categories of explanation (Cornell & Lawton 1992): niche heterogeneity (resource partitioning), spatial heterogeneity (intraspecific aggregation), and the fullness of the niche space (saturation level). We conclude that these Drosophila communities are dominated by intraspecific aggregation, not by resource partitioning, and they are not fully saturated.
Male, Insecta, Arthropoda, Ecology, Geography, Models, Genetic, Diptera, Genetic Variation, Biodiversity, Species Specificity, fruit flies, flies, Animalia, Animals, Drosophila, Female, Taxonomy
Male, Insecta, Arthropoda, Ecology, Geography, Models, Genetic, Diptera, Genetic Variation, Biodiversity, Species Specificity, fruit flies, flies, Animalia, Animals, Drosophila, Female, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 64 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
