
handle: 11696/33190
The requirement for calibrating transducers having subnanometre displacement sensitivities stimulated the development of an instrument in which the displacement is measured by a combination of optical and X–ray interferometry. The need to combine both types of interferometry arises from the fact that optical interferometry enables displacements corresponding to whole numbers of optical fringes to be measured very precisely, but subdivision of an optical fringe may give rise to errors that are significant at the subnanometre level. The X–ray interferometer is used to subdivide the optical fringes. Traceability to the meter is achieved via traceable calibrations of the lattice parameter of silicon and of the laser frequency. Polarization encoding and phase modulation allow the optical interferometer to be precisely set on a specific position of the interference fringe—the null point setting. The null point settings in the interference fringe field correspond to dark or bright fringes. Null measurement ensures maximum possible noise rejection. However, polarization encoding makes the interferometer nonlinear, but all nonlinearity effects are effectively zero at the fringe set point. The X–ray interferometer provides the means for linear subdivision of optical fringes. Each X–ray fringe corresponds to a displacement that is equal to the lattice parameter of silicon, which is ca .0.19 nm for the (220) lattice planes. For displacements up to 1 m the measurement uncertainties at 95% confidence level are ± 30 pm, and for displacements up to 100 m and 1 mm the uncertainties are ± 35 and ± 170 pm, respectively. Important features of the instrument, which is located at the National Physical Laboratory, are the silicon monolith interferometer that both diffracts X–rays and forms part of the optical interferometer, a totally reflecting parabolic collimator for enhancing the usable X–ray flux and the servo–control for the interferometers.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 65 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
