Reply to Falcon

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 May 2016 United Kingdom English Publisher:The Royal SocietyJournal:Biology Letters, volume 12, page 20,160,213 (issn: 1744-9561, eissn: 1744-957X,

Copyright policy )Funded by:EC | RELNET

Authors: Dunbar, R; Wlodarski, R;

doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0213

pmid: 27220859

pmc: PMC4892249

Reply to Falcon

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

We appreciate Falcon's [[1][1]] interest in our paper on male and female mating strategies in humans. However, she addresses a rather different issue to the one we were interested in. Her concern is with whether the psychological dispositions implied by the anatomical and sociological indices we

Country

United Kingdom

Related Organizations

University of Oxford
United Kingdom
Department of Experimental Psychology
United Kingdom
THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS AND SCHOLARS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD
United Kingdom
Department of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford
United Kingdom

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	1
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average