
pmid: 29847342
pmc: PMC6039381
Purpose of review To help guide metabolic support in critical care, an understanding of patients’ nutritional status and risk is important. Several methods to monitor lean body mass are increasingly used in the ICU and knowledge about their advantages and limitations is essential. Recent findings Computed tomography scan analysis, musculoskeletal ultrasound, and bioelectrical impedance analysis are emerging as powerful clinical tools to monitor lean body mass during ICU stay. Accuracy, expertise, ease of use at the bedside, and costs are important factors which play a role in determining which method is most suitable. Exciting new research provides an insight into not only quantitative measurements, but also qualitative measurements of lean body mass, such as infiltration of adipose tissue and intramuscular glycogen storage. Summary Methods to monitor lean body mass in the ICU are under constant development, improving upon bedside usability and offering new modalities to measure. This provides clinicians with valuable markers with which to identify patients at high nutritional risk and to evaluate metabolic support during critical illness.
Critical Care, Critical Illness, Malnutrition, Nutritional Status, Muscular Atrophy, Nutrition Assessment, Point-of-Care Testing, EMC MUSC-01-48-01, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Body Composition, Electric Impedance, METABOLIC SUPPORT: Edited by Arthur R.H. van Zanten, Humans, Muscle, Skeletal, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, EMC COEUR-09, Ultrasonography
Critical Care, Critical Illness, Malnutrition, Nutritional Status, Muscular Atrophy, Nutrition Assessment, Point-of-Care Testing, EMC MUSC-01-48-01, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Body Composition, Electric Impedance, METABOLIC SUPPORT: Edited by Arthur R.H. van Zanten, Humans, Muscle, Skeletal, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, EMC COEUR-09, Ultrasonography
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 83 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
