Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Donor Tissue Selection for Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty

Authors: Otman Sandali; Vincent Borderie; Elena Basli; Pablo Goldschmidt; Laurent Laroche;

Donor Tissue Selection for Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty

Abstract

To assess the influence of donor characteristics on the outcome of anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) and to evaluate whether corneal donor tissue considered unsuitable for penetrating or posterior lamellar keratoplasty due to poor endothelial condition may be safely used for ALK.Institutional setting. One hundred sixty-six consecutive ALK (166 patients) performed for optical indication in eyes with corneal diseases not involving the corneal endothelium. The main outcome measures were graft survival, early (0-12 months postoperatively) and late (after 12 months) annual endothelial cell loss, and postoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity.The average and extreme values of donor tissue characteristics were: donor age, 70.6 years (range, 28-88 years); organ culture time, 20.9 days (range, 12-35 days); graft endothelial cell density before transplantation, 2047 cells per millimeters (range, 100-3300 cells/mm2); and deswelling time, 2.0 days (range, 1-4 days). The average follow-up time of patients was 48.1 ± 24.8 months (mean ± SD). None of the donor characteristics significantly influenced graft survival or postoperative endothelial cell loss (early and late phase). Donor age >80 years was associated with lower postoperative visual acuity at all postoperative points in time (P < 0.05). At 3 years, the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity was 0.44 (20/55) for grafts from donors older than 80 years and 0.25 (20/35) for younger donors. This result was shown to be significant both in univariate and in multivariate analysis.Grafts from elderly donors should be discarded before ALK. Conversely, donor tissue with poor endothelial cell density (<2000 cells/mm2) is suitable for ALK.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Graft Survival, Age Factors, Visual Acuity, Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss, Middle Aged, Tissue Donors, Corneal Diseases, Donor Selection, Corneal Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Aged, Proportional Hazards Models, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?