
pmid: 18277171
Advances in causal inference, study designs, and quantitative methods have led to new challenges for structuring a cohesive epidemiology methods course. This is particularly true for courses aimed at students who are training for a research career. Such students are expected to have a strong understanding of epidemiologic inference and modeling. They should grasp the principles of study design and analysis, and be able to interpret and report results effectively. This commentary discusses ways in which courses on epidemiologic methods can be made more effective, including: (1) a definition of the scope of epidemiologic methods; (2) a framework for defining a curriculum for heterogeneous student populations; (3) the need for computing and practical exercises; and (4) a call for increased attention to epidemiology education.
Causality, Epidemiology, Teaching, Education, Public Health Professional, Humans, Curriculum, Education, Graduate, Epidemiologic Methods
Causality, Epidemiology, Teaching, Education, Public Health Professional, Humans, Curriculum, Education, Graduate, Epidemiologic Methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
