
pmid: 1669407
This report deals with the first 350 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at Creighton University, beginning in October 1989, by one of the authors (R.J.F., Jr.). An open technique was used for initial access to the abdominal cavity in 343 patients (98%). Patients included 274 females and 76 males, with an average age of 45.5 years. Weight ranged from 72 to 316 pounds (32-142.2 kg). The laparoscopic procedure was successfully completed in 338 (96.6%). Operative cholangiography was performed in 113 (32.3%), and 52 (14.7%) had acute cholecystitis as determined by the final pathological report. Median operating time was 80 min. There was no operative mortality. Bile duct injury was not seen. Postoperative complications occurred in 21 patients (6%), only two of which were directly related to the open technique (cellulitis of the umbilical wound requiring antibiotics). A third patient (0.3% of 343 successful laparoscopies) required reoperation on postoperative day 4 for a small bowel perforation; the exact cause could not be determined, but conceivably it was related to the umbilical minilaparotomy. We conclude that the open technique is safe and effective method for initial peritoneal access prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Intraoperative Care, Adolescent, Dissection, Cystic Duct, Gallstones, Length of Stay, Catheterization, Fasciotomy, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Cholelithiasis, Cholecystitis, Electrocoagulation, Humans, Female, Laser Therapy, Cholangiography, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Intraoperative Care, Adolescent, Dissection, Cystic Duct, Gallstones, Length of Stay, Catheterization, Fasciotomy, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Cholelithiasis, Cholecystitis, Electrocoagulation, Humans, Female, Laser Therapy, Cholangiography, Aged
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
