
pmid: 1885795
This study was performed to investigate whether intravenous administration of Gd-DTPA can improve the accuracy of MR imaging in the detection and staging of bladder neoplasms. In 68 patients with suspected urinary bladder neoplasms, MR examinations were performed with T1-weighted SE sequences before and after intravenous administration of Gd-DTPA. The findings were compared with surgical staging using the TNM classification. Overall staging accuracy of contrast enhanced MR was 46%; if stages Ta-T3a were combined into one group, the accuracy was 69%. Accuracy was low (19%) in tumors without muscular bladder wall invasion (Ta). In cases with extravesical spread (greater than or equal to T3b), the accuracy of staging was 87%. Contrast enhanced MR detected extravesical extension of tumor with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 95%. Contrast enhancement increased the sensitivity for detection of urinary bladder neoplasms from 70% on precontrast T1-weighted scans to 79% on postcontrast scans. In comparison with T2-weighted scans, the Gd-DTPA enhanced T1-weighted scans had better image quality and lower acquisition times.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Gadolinium DTPA, Male, Contrast Media, Middle Aged, Pentetic Acid, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diagnosis, Differential, Predictive Value of Tests, Lymphatic Metastasis, Organometallic Compounds, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Carcinoma in Situ, Aged, Neoplasm Staging
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Gadolinium DTPA, Male, Contrast Media, Middle Aged, Pentetic Acid, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diagnosis, Differential, Predictive Value of Tests, Lymphatic Metastasis, Organometallic Compounds, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Carcinoma in Situ, Aged, Neoplasm Staging
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
