Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Staging of Urinary Bladder Neoplasms with MR Imaging

Is Gd-DTPA Helpful?
Authors: Jörg-Michael Neuerburg; Rolf-Werner Günther; Michael Sohn; Bohndorf K; Fritz Teufl;

Staging of Urinary Bladder Neoplasms with MR Imaging

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate whether intravenous administration of Gd-DTPA can improve the accuracy of MR imaging in the detection and staging of bladder neoplasms. In 68 patients with suspected urinary bladder neoplasms, MR examinations were performed with T1-weighted SE sequences before and after intravenous administration of Gd-DTPA. The findings were compared with surgical staging using the TNM classification. Overall staging accuracy of contrast enhanced MR was 46%; if stages Ta-T3a were combined into one group, the accuracy was 69%. Accuracy was low (19%) in tumors without muscular bladder wall invasion (Ta). In cases with extravesical spread (greater than or equal to T3b), the accuracy of staging was 87%. Contrast enhanced MR detected extravesical extension of tumor with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 95%. Contrast enhancement increased the sensitivity for detection of urinary bladder neoplasms from 70% on precontrast T1-weighted scans to 79% on postcontrast scans. In comparison with T2-weighted scans, the Gd-DTPA enhanced T1-weighted scans had better image quality and lower acquisition times.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Gadolinium DTPA, Male, Contrast Media, Middle Aged, Pentetic Acid, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diagnosis, Differential, Predictive Value of Tests, Lymphatic Metastasis, Organometallic Compounds, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Carcinoma in Situ, Aged, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    35
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
35
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!