Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

QUANTITATIVE POTENTIALS OF DYNAMIC EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Authors: William L. Greenberg; Stephen E. Derenzo; Grant T. Gullberg; Ronald H. Huesman; Thomas F. Budinger;

QUANTITATIVE POTENTIALS OF DYNAMIC EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Abstract

Statistical uncertainties in emission computed tomography were simulated in 60 computer studies involving various numbers of events and distributions of activity. Previous studies have shown that for a uniform disc of activity of rms percentage of uncertainty per resolution cell is: 120 X (number of resolution cells)1/4 X (number of events per resolution cell)- 1/2. In this work we examined the more general situation where one or two regions of uniform activity are surrounded by a uniform background, and found that for an equal number of recorded events the uncertainties were reduced when the activity was concentrated in a portion of the field. The empirical relation rms % uncertainty in nt = 120(N)1/4(nt)-3/4, where nt is the number of events in an average target (organ) resolution cell and N is the total number of events recorded, satisfactorily described the relationships between uncertainties, contrast, total number of detected events, and number of resolution cells for all 60 computer studies. By means of this relation, we show the theoretical possibility of gated cardiac imaging with 20% uncertainty in 1 cm X 1 cm regions, and of 1-sec cerebral blood-flow images with 20% uncertainty in 2 cm X 2 cm regions.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Computers, Statistics as Topic, Radionuclide Imaging, Tomography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    143
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 0.1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
143
Top 10%
Top 0.1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?