Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty with a Metallic Hinged Prosthesis

Authors: William F. Blair; Joseph A. Buckwalter; Donald G. Shurr;

Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty with a Metallic Hinged Prosthesis

Abstract

A long-term clinical study of 41 Flatt metallic hinged prostheses inserted in the metacarpophalangeal joints of ten rheumatoid patients was completed to provide a historic and clinical perspective of the ongoing clinical performance of this prosthesis. Postsurgical analysis performed an average of 138 months after operation demonstrated an average active range of metacarpophalangeal joint motion of 24 degrees, with average maximum active extension of 16 degrees and flexion of 40 degrees. Motion through this device in the metacarpophalangeal joint was relatively well preserved with time and was within a functional range. Recurrent digital ulnar deviation was observed in 58% of patients, digital malrotation in 50%, and extensor tendon redislocation in 45%. The prosthesis failed by screw or prong failure (47%). Periprosthetic radiolucency was common (87%), indicating poor host bone tolerance. With net bone resorption the prosthesis migrated, often perforating the cortex of the metacarpal (44%) or proximal phalanx (59%). Patient satisfaction, despite suboptimal clinical results, was high. All patients considered the appearance of the operated hand and pain relief improved. These advantages must be considered relative to the disadvantages of recurrent digital deformity, poor host tolerance, and unpredictability of clinical results.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Postoperative Care, Joint Prosthesis, Movement, Middle Aged, Metacarpophalangeal Joint, Radiography, Finger Joint, Methods, Humans, Equipment Failure, Female, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!