
doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv065
pmid: 25848112
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of personal radiation shields currently worn in hospital and other diagnostic environments. This study was performed with four different radioisotopes; (18)F, (99m)Tc, (124)I and (131)I. (18)F results showed a decrease in dose with 0.5-mm Pb shielding but the reduction provided does not warrant its use clinically. (124)I testing demonstrated that dose enhancement can occur in greater shield thicknesses. PET isotope (124)I can be adequately shielded using 0.25-mm Pb equivalent aprons but any higher thickness increase the wearer's dose. As a result more shielding does not always equal more protection. The (131)I test showed that no dose reduction occurred, even when tested with up to 1.25-mm Pb equivalent shielding. Novel radioisotopes being used in the laboratory and clinic should be individually tested as each requires specific shielding testing.
Fluorine Radioisotopes, Phantoms, Imaging, Protective Devices, Technetium, Radiation Dosage, Hospitals, Iodine Radioisotopes, Radiation Protection, Lead, Protective Clothing, Occupational Exposure, Positron-Emission Tomography, Radiation, Ionizing, Humans
Fluorine Radioisotopes, Phantoms, Imaging, Protective Devices, Technetium, Radiation Dosage, Hospitals, Iodine Radioisotopes, Radiation Protection, Lead, Protective Clothing, Occupational Exposure, Positron-Emission Tomography, Radiation, Ionizing, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
