
doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcn022
pmid: 18334497
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is recognized as the reference method to measure bone mineral density (BMD) with acceptable accuracy errors and good precision and reproducibility. The World Health Organization (WHO) has established DXA as the best densitometric technique for assessing BMD in postmenopausal women and based the definitions of osteopenia and osteoporosis on its results. DXA allows accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis, estimation of fracture risk and monitoring of patients undergoing treatment. However, when DXA studies are performed incorrectly, it can lead to major mistakes in diagnosis and therapy. This article reviews the fundamentals of positioning, scan analysis and interpretation of DXA in clinical practice.
Male, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Fractures, Bone, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Predictive Value of Tests, Humans, Female, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
Male, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Fractures, Bone, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Predictive Value of Tests, Humans, Female, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 260 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
