
handle: 10281/295543 , 11383/2147994 , 11573/1692116
ABSTRACT Observations of high-redshift quasars provide information on the massive black holes (MBHs) powering them and the galaxies hosting them. Current observations of z ≳ 6 hosts, at sub-millimetre wavelengths, trace the properties of cold gas, and these are used to compare with the correlations between MBHs and galaxies characterizing the z = 0 population. The relations at z = 0, however, rely on stellar-based tracers of the galaxy properties. We perform a very high resolution cosmological zoom-in simulation of a z = 7 quasar including state-of-the-art non-equilibrium chemistry, MBH formation, growth, and feedback, to assess the evolution of the galaxy host and the central MBH, and compare the results with recent ALMA observations of high-redshift quasars. We measure both the stellar-based quantities used to establish the z = 0 correlations, as well as the gas-based quantities available in z ≳ 6 observations, adopting the same assumptions and techniques used in observational studies. The high-redshift studies argued that MBHs at high redshift deviate from the local MBH–galaxy correlations. In our analysis of the single galaxy we evolve, we find that the high-redshift population sits on the same correlations as the local one, when using the same tracers used at z = 0. When using the gas-based tracers, however, MBHs appear to be overmassive. The discrepancy between local and high-redshift MBHs seems to be caused by the different tracers employed, and the necessary assumptions, and not by an intrinsic difference. Better calibration of the tracers, higher resolution data, and availability of facilities that can probe the stellar population will be crucial to assess precisely and accurately high-redshift quasar hosts.
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), Galaxies: evolution; Galaxies: formation; Galaxies: ISM, FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA), galaxies: formation, Galaxies: evolution; Galaxies: formation; Galaxies: ISM;, galaxies: evolution, [PHYS.ASTR] Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph], galaxies: ISM, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), Galaxies: evolution; Galaxies: formation; Galaxies: ISM, FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA), galaxies: formation, Galaxies: evolution; Galaxies: formation; Galaxies: ISM;, galaxies: evolution, [PHYS.ASTR] Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph], galaxies: ISM, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 66 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
