
arXiv: astro-ph/9409011
handle: 1887/6682
We have reanalyzed a data set of 99 low redshift ($ z < 0.1 $) Abell clusters and determined their shapes. For this, three different measures are used. We use Monte-Carlo simulations to investigate the errors in the methods. The corrected distribution of cluster ellipticities shows a peak at $ ��\sim 0.4 $ and extends to $ ��\sim 0.8 $. The results are self-consistent, i.e., with the corrected distribution over projected cluster shapes we can reconstruct the observed distribution and the observed relation between the number of galaxies in a cluster and its ellipticity. It is shown that the richer clusters are intrinsically more nearly spherical than the poorer ones. The corrected distribution of cluster shapes is more consistent with a prolate population than with an oblate population. We compare the corrected true distribution of (projected) ellipticities with predictions from N-body simulations. For this, we use a catalogue of 75 N-body simulated clusters (van Kampen 1994) which assume a CDM spectrum with $ ��= 1.0 $. The simulations include a recipe for galaxy formation and merging. 'Observing' these simulated clusters produces an ellipticity distribution that extends to much higher $ ��$ and that has too few nearly spherical clusters. Preliminary results of simulations of the formation of clusters in an $ ��= 0.2 $ universe suggest that, on average, clusters are more nearly spherical in this case.
17 pages, postscript, submitted to MNRAS
Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics
Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
