
Abstract We develop a system of basic probability reasoning founded on two great logical concepts, Gentzen’s natural deduction systems and Carnap–Popper probability of sentences. Our system makes it possible to manipulate with probabilized sentences and justify their causal relationships: if probabilities of sentences $A$ and $B$ are in $[r,1]$ and $[s,1]$, respectively, then the probability of sentence $C$ belongs to $[t,1]$, i.e. $A^{r},B^{s}\vdash C^{t}$, for $r,s,t\in [0,1]$. We prove that our system is sound and complete with respect to the traditional Carnap–Popper type probability semantics. This approach opens up a new perspective of proof-theoretic treatment of sentence probability, potentially allowing immediate algorithmic use of the pure syntactic convenience of natural deductions in programming.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
