
Abstract This paper studies the political determinants of inequalities in government interventions under majoritarian (MAJ) and proportional representation (PR) systems. We propose a probabilistic voting model of electoral competition with highly targetable government interventions and heterogeneous localities. We uncover a novel relative electoral sensitivity effect that affects government interventions only under MAJ systems. This effect tends to reduce inequality in government interventions under MAJ systems when districts are composed of sufficiently homogeneous localities. This effect goes against the conventional wisdom that MAJ systems are necessarily more conducive to inequality than PR systems. We illustrate the empirical relevance of our results with numerical simulations on possible reforms of the US Electoral College.
and Voting Behavior, Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, PublicGood, Distributive Politics, Electoral Systems, Electoral College, PublicGood, Inequality, Analysis of Collective Decision-Making: General, Public Economics: General, Programmation et méthodes de simulation, Elections, Distributive Politics, Electoral Systems, D70, D72, Inequality, Legislatures, Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior, Electoral College, Economie, Théorie de la décision et des choix collectifs, Public Good, Economie régionale et spaciale, H00
and Voting Behavior, Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, PublicGood, Distributive Politics, Electoral Systems, Electoral College, PublicGood, Inequality, Analysis of Collective Decision-Making: General, Public Economics: General, Programmation et méthodes de simulation, Elections, Distributive Politics, Electoral Systems, D70, D72, Inequality, Legislatures, Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior, Electoral College, Economie, Théorie de la décision et des choix collectifs, Public Good, Economie régionale et spaciale, H00
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
