Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Population Structure and Insecticidal Control of the Sawtoothed Grain Beetle (Coleoptera: Silvanidae) Under Simulated Field Conditions

Authors: Philip L. Mason; Richard J. Brown; Richard A. Nichols;

Population Structure and Insecticidal Control of the Sawtoothed Grain Beetle (Coleoptera: Silvanidae) Under Simulated Field Conditions

Abstract

Insecticidal control and genetic structure were studied in a strain of the saw-toothed grain beetle, Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.), initially comprising 69.5% susceptible phenotypes. Populations were exposed for 20 wk to fabric treatments of pirimiphos-methyl in model grain bins under simulated field conditions, which included the presence of 16 kibbled wheat-filled peripheral refuges mounted in 2 rows (4 to a wall) and a central bulk of untreated wheat. Substantial control, related to the extent of treatment (number of walls sprayed), was achieved with all treatments. Between 43.4 and 80.0% of individuals died within 3 d of being introduced into treated bins. By 20 wk, all treated populations were reduced by ≥85.7%, whereas no live beetles were recovered from the most extensively treated bin. More beetles were found in wheat bulks than in all refuges from the same bin. The final distribution of live and dead beetles was predominantly the result of the swift action of the insecticide, especially at the boundaries of treated and untreated areas. Microhabitat preferences also significantly influenced population distribution. Treatments selected for an increased proportion of resistant phenotypes among surviving beetles and even higher proportions in their offspring. This response suggests that the exposure to insecticide in the grain bins was qualitatively different from that experienced in the standard laboratory bioassay. The beetle populations within treated bins were divided into subpopulations with heritable differences in their knockdown proportions. This observation suggests that the insecticide treatment reduced dispersal between subpopulations.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!