Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Spread and Control of Potato Leafroll Virus in Minnesota

Authors: A. Hanafi; E. B. Radcliffe; D. W. Ragsdale;

Spread and Control of Potato Leafroll Virus in Minnesota

Abstract

We compared importance of green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer), and potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphormae (Thomas), apterae and alatae in secondary spread of potato leafroll virus (PLRV) and the control achieved with foliar sprays alone to that of conventional practice using a soil systemic. Density gradients of apterae were produced by application of insecticidal sprays. Spread of PLRV from centrally located infector units was monitored in foliage serologically. PLRV infection ranged from 23.7 to 74% in 1985 and 12.3 to 77.2% in 1986. PLRV infection was significantly correlated with cumulative green peach aphid and with potato aphid apterae-days both years. Green peach aphid was more abundant than potato aphid and alatae were few both years. At all distances (1-5 m) from infector units, infection across rows was 38.7-60.6% of that within rows. Steep gradients of PLRV infection with distance from infector units indicated short-distance movement of vectors and suggested that apterae were of prime importance in PLRV spread. Check plots without a PLRV source and not augmented with green peach apllid (1986 only) had a final PLRV incidence of 1.5%, indicating only minor invasion of these plots by viruliferous alatae. Weekly application of methamidophos sprays reduced PLRV incidence to that in plotstreated with aldicarb at planting and weekly methamidophos sprays. It should be feasible to develop a seed potato pest management program for Minnesota based on foliar sprays alone.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    65
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
65
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!