Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Sampling for the Sugarcane Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Sugarcane

Authors: David G. Hall;

Sampling for the Sugarcane Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Sugarcane

Abstract

A sampling study was conducted in sugarcane to estimate infestation levels of the sugarcane borer (SCB), Diatraea saccharalis (F.). A single sample consisted of five stalks per plant from five plants spaced 3 m apart. A mean of 7 min was required for one scout to take one sample in cane 0.6–1.2 m tall; 16 min was required in cane 3.0–3.6 m tall. Variance to mean ratios, Green’s coefficient of dispersion, and a simple linear regression of log10( s 2)against log10( x ¯) showed that SCB populations usually were aggregated in sugarcane. Number of SCB larvae per sample followed the negative binomial distribution. In 0.4- to 0.8-ha areas of sugarcane, aggregation was not detected at low population densities but was pronounced at high densities. Estimated SCB infestation levels (mean number of borers per 25 stalks × 100) ranged from 0.4 to 48.0% in the different fields sampled. Based on 90% CL and a mean of nine samples per 0.4- to 0.8-ha area, accuracy of estimates for SCB infestation levels ranged from ±0.8 to ±26.6% with an overall average of ±7.4% based on simple variance or ±7.1% based on a regression estimate of variance. At infestation levels <10%, estimates of SCB infestation levels were generally within ±4.5% of the true levels based on simple variance or ±3.9% based on regressed variance. Accuracy of infestation level estimates generally decreased as SCB infestation levels increased.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!