
Abstract Management of invasive fungal disease (IFD) is increasingly challenging due to recognition of novel at-risk groups, emergence of new fungal pathogens and antifungal drug resistance. Together with the availability of new diagnostic tests and treatment modalities, robust and broadly applicable IFD case definitions are critical to support research. However, the ability to classify IFDs with the current definitions has decreased, prompting the development of new case definitions. Furthermore, current case definitions rely on a single positive test as mycological evidence, while not considering discordant evidence. We propose to explore the development of a machine learning (ML)-based IFD classification model, which uses algorithms to automatically ‘learn’ from observed data to consistently and accurately classify IFDs. Although developing and validating an ML-based IFD classification model is a significant undertaking, such an endeavour should be considered a worthwhile investment by the mycology community to standardize and reduce the ambiguity in the diagnosis of non-proven IFD.
Science & Technology, 3202 Clinical sciences, 3214 Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences, SDG 3 – Goede gezondheid en welzijn, Microbiology, Machine Learning, Infectious Diseases, Viewpoint, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, INFECTIONS, 1108 Medical Microbiology, Humans, Pharmacology & Pharmacy, ASPERGILLOSIS, 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Algorithms, Invasive Fungal Infections, 0605 Microbiology
Science & Technology, 3202 Clinical sciences, 3214 Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences, SDG 3 – Goede gezondheid en welzijn, Microbiology, Machine Learning, Infectious Diseases, Viewpoint, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, INFECTIONS, 1108 Medical Microbiology, Humans, Pharmacology & Pharmacy, ASPERGILLOSIS, 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Algorithms, Invasive Fungal Infections, 0605 Microbiology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
