Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Black Cutworm Control, 1989

Authors: K. Ostlie; S. Chaddha;

Black Cutworm Control, 1989

Abstract

Abstract Performance of granular and liquid insecticides against BCW was evaluated with artificial infestations at the Rosemount Experiment Station, Rosemount, MN. Treatment plots, each measuring 4 rows (30-inch spacing) × 50 ft, were established in corn planted on 2 Jun. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 4 replications. Granular insecticides were applied in a 7-inch band ahead of the presswheel or in furrow at planting with modified Noble applicators mounted on a John Deere 7100 MaxiMerge planter. When corn reached the 2-leaf stage a central portion of each plot (2 rows × 15 ft) was enclosed by an aluminum barrier buried 3-4 inches into the soil that projected 4 to 5 inches above soil level. Plant population within the barriers was thinned to 23,900 plants/acre. Liquid insecticides were broadcast on 15 Jun am using a CO2-powered backpack sprayer calibrated to deliver 21 gal/acre at 25 psi through 8002 nozzles. During application, air temperature averaged 77°F and winds ranged from still to 2 mph. Each plot was infested with a mixture of 40 third and fourth instar black cutwork larvae on the evening of 15 Jun and early morning of 16 Jun. Plots were examined every 2-3 d for leaf feeding and cutting. Cut plants were marked with a plastic stake to avoid misses or recounts as undamaged plant on later visits. On 27 Jun (11 d after infestation), each plot was censused with the number of injured plants and dead plants recorded. Before analysis, percentage data were subjected to an arcsine transformation.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?