Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Maize Weevil Control, 1987

Authors: K. M. Maredia; J. A. Mihm; A. Tasistro;

Maize Weevil Control, 1987

Abstract

Abstract In Test 1, 19 treatments were applied to uninfested grain of‘Across 8363 QPM’ maize (11% moisture) in December 1986. Each treatment consisted of 1.0 kg of grain, divided into 4 replicate batches of 250 g each in pint glass jars (lids ventilated with screen apertures). They were held at 25 ± 1°C and 60-80% RH. Each replicate jar was infested with 50 ± 2 newly emerged, unsexed weevils 10 DAT, and mortality was recorded after a 7-d exposure period. The treatments with high initial mortality were reinfested with 50 ± 2 weevils/jar 3 months after treatment. Treatments giving only partial or no control were maintained with only the initial infestation. Effective treatments were again reinfested at 6 and 9 months after treatment to check on persistence of control. Between intervals, seeds were moved to Poza Rica, Mexico (a humid lowland tropical area), to simulate field conditions. Eleven months after treatment, the percentage of germination (in greenhouse flats, 4-cm soil cover) was determined to assess possible phytotoxic effects on seed and reduction in germination as a result of weevil damage to grain. In Test 2, to simulate the situation of field infested grain, weevils were allowed to feed and lay eggs on 20 kg of‘Across 8363 QPM’ maize grain (12.5% moisture) for 14 d. Then, the same 19 treatments used in Test 1 (1.0 kg grain/treatment split into 4 replicates) were made. At 40 DAT, the number of adult weevils emerged in each treatment was recorded.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!