
pmid: 8005448
pmc: PMC1205902
Abstract In Drosophila melanogaster, weak incompatibility in crosses between infected and uninfected strains is associated with a Wolbachia microorganism. Crosses between infected males and uninfected females show a reduction (15-30%) in egg hatch. Progeny tests indicated that the infection is widespread in Australian D. melanogaster populations and that populations are polymorphic for the presence of the infection. The infection status of 266 lines from 12 populations along the eastern coast of Australia was determined by 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining of embryos. All populations contained both infected and uninfected flies. Infection frequencies varied between populations but there was no discernible geographical pattern. Laboratory experiments indicated that the infection was not associated with a reduction in fecundity as in Drosophila simulans. Incompatibility levels could not be increased by laboratory selection on isofemale lines. Factors contributing to the persistence of the infection in D. melanogaster populations are discussed.
Male, 570, Cytoplasm, Indoles, Insecta, Arthropoda, 630, flies, Animals, Animalia, Crosses, Genetic, Alphaproteobacteria, Fluorescent Dyes, Taxonomy, Polymorphism, Genetic, Diptera, Australia, Biodiversity, Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, Population, Infertility, fruit flies, Female
Male, 570, Cytoplasm, Indoles, Insecta, Arthropoda, 630, flies, Animals, Animalia, Crosses, Genetic, Alphaproteobacteria, Fluorescent Dyes, Taxonomy, Polymorphism, Genetic, Diptera, Australia, Biodiversity, Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, Population, Infertility, fruit flies, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 146 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
