Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Forest Sciencearrow_drop_down
Forest Science
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Production Efficiency and Radiation Use Efficiency of Four Tree Species Receiving Irrigation and Fertilization

Authors: Christopher B. Allen; Rodney E. Will; Marshall A. Jacobson;

Production Efficiency and Radiation Use Efficiency of Four Tree Species Receiving Irrigation and Fertilization

Abstract

Abstract To determine the effect of resource availability on efficiency of stemwood production, we calculated radiation use efficiency (Εstem = stem production/photosynthetically active radiation [PAR] interception) and production efficiency (PEstem = stem production/leaf area index [LAI]) from measurements of LAI, intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (IPAR), and stem production on stands of Pinus taeda, Pinus elliottii, Liquidambar styraciflua, and Platanus occidentalis during the sixth growing season. Treatments were control, irrigation only, and irrigation plus 57, 85, or 114 kg N ha−1 y−1. Compared to the control, irrigation plus 85 kg N ha−1 increased stem production: 8.7–15.0 Mg ha−1 y−1 (loblolly), 6.0–10.7 Mg ha−1 y−1 (slash), 1.2–12.8 Mg ha−1 y−1 (sweetgum), and 0.5–9.6 Mg ha−1 y−1 (sycamore). Annual PAR capture and LAI were correlated with stem production (r2 = 0.80, r2 = 0.66, respectively, average of 4 species). Fertilization and irrigation increased Εstem and PEstem for sycamore, whereas only fertilization increased efficiencies for sweetgum. Irrigation increased PEstem for the pines. Foliar [N], often a surrogate for photosynthetic efficiency, was positively correlated with both efficiency variables for the hardwoods (r2 from 0.65 to 0.79). For the pines, canopy size was the primary growth determinant. FOR. SCI. 51(6):556–569.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!