Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Forestry An Internat...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
Article . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

The effect of treeshelter height on the early growth of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.)

Authors: G. Mayhead;

The effect of treeshelter height on the early growth of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.)

Abstract

Summary Sessile oak 1 + 1 transplants were grown for 4 years in a weed-free environment at 1 X 1 m spacing on a fertile sheltered site. Four experiment treatments were imposed: control with no treeshelter and treeshelters of heights 0.6 m, 1.2 m and 1.8 m. Treatments had no significant effect on tree survival. Taller shelters produced taller, lower diameter trees of increasingly low dry root weight. The root:shoot ratio was 0.675 in control trees but declined to 0.291 in 1.8-m shelters. Trees from 0.6-m and 1.2-m shelters (mean heights 152 m and 206 m respectively) supported themselves unaided after removal of the stake and treeshelter. The trees from 1.8-m shelters of mean height 234 cm at age four collapsed completely when support was removed.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze