
pmid: 37170657
Abstract The individual difference of intrinsic functional connectivity is increasingly acknowledged to be biologically informative and behaviorally relevant. However, such valuable information is still discounted as a stochastic variation in previous studies of cognitive training. Here, we explored the plasticity of intersubject similarity in functional connectivity (ISFC), induced by long-term abacus-based mental calculation (AMC) training. Using a longitudinal dataset (AMC: n = 40, 5-year training; Control: n = 43), we found robust training effect of enhanced ISFC, after accounting for the factor of development. Notably, the enhancement focused on selective subsets of FCs, or the “critical FCs,” which predominantly impacted the default-mode and visual networks. Using a cross-sectional dataset with a larger sample (AMC: n = 93, 1/3/5-year training; Control: n = 110), we observed that the “critical FCs” and its intersubject similarity could predict mental calculation ability and its intersubject similarity, respectively, in the AMC group. However, such predictions cannot be generalized to the control group, suggesting that long-term training may be a prerequisite for establishing such brain–behavior relationships. Jointly, our findings implicated that the enhanced ISFC with profound impact on the default-mode network could be a plastic change that is associated with behavioral gains of training.
Brain Mapping, Cross-Sectional Studies, Brain, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mathematics
Brain Mapping, Cross-Sectional Studies, Brain, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
