
Increasing availability of large clinical data sets is driving a proliferation of observational epidemiology studies in perioperative care. This wealth of data must be judged both on its inherent quality and the statistical techniques used to analyse the data set. Without some basic understanding of the methods involved, it remains difficult to interpret the results of these perioperative studies. Indeed, some studies' conclusions may be very persuasive, but their limitations may necessitate cautious interpretation. In this editorial, we will briefly describe the statistical technique of propensity scoring, identifying when propensity scoring methods should be used and practical considerations in the development and the application of propensity scoring methods. We will conclude with some comments on the strengths and limitations of propensity scoring methods.
Humans, Propensity Score, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Humans, Propensity Score, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 75 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
