
Multifold crossvalidation is routinely used for assessing the prediction error of an approximation model for a black-box function. Despite its popularity, this method is known to have high variability. To mitigate this drawback, we propose an experimental design approach that borrows Latin hypercube designs to construct a structured crossvalidation sample such that the input values in each fold achieve uniformity. Theoretical results show that the estimate of the prediction error of the proposed method has significantly smaller variability than its counterpart under independent and identically distributed sampling. Numerical examples corroborate the theoretical results. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
