Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Briefings in Bioinfo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

High-dimensional genomic feature selection with the ordered stereotype logit model

Authors: Anna Eames Seffernick; Krzysztof Mrózek; Deedra Nicolet; Richard M. Stone; Ann-Katherin Eisfeld; John C. Byrd; Kellie J. Archer;

High-dimensional genomic feature selection with the ordered stereotype logit model

Abstract

AbstractFor many high-dimensional genomic and epigenomic datasets, the outcome of interest is ordinal. While these ordinal outcomes are often thought of as the observed cutpoints of some latent continuous variable, some ordinal outcomes are truly discrete and are comprised of the subjective combination of several factors. The nonlinear stereotype logistic model, which does not assume proportional odds, was developed for these ‘assessed’ ordinal variables. It has previously been extended to the frequentist high-dimensional feature selection setting, but the Bayesian framework provides some distinct advantages in terms of simultaneous uncertainty quantification and variable selection. Here, we review the stereotype model and Bayesian variable selection methods and demonstrate how to combine them to select genomic features associated with discrete ordinal outcomes. We compared the Bayesian and frequentist methods in terms of variable selection performance. We additionally applied the Bayesian stereotype method to an acute myeloid leukemia RNA-sequencing dataset to further demonstrate its variable selection abilities by identifying features associated with the European LeukemiaNet prognostic risk score.

Keywords

Logistic Models, Risk Factors, Bayes Theorem, Genomics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
gold