In developing resemblance nominalism, Rodriguez-Pereyra attempts to meet the challenge that truths involving abstract nouns pose to the doctrine. He holds that one can render sentences containing abstract nouns without invoking attributes and defends this view by giving nominalistic sentences that express the truthmakers of two such sentences: �Scarlet is a colour� and �Carmine resembles vermillion more than it resembles French blue.� This article argues that his renderings have serious problems and fall far short of meeting the challenge posed by truths involving abstract nouns.