Downloads provided by UsageCounts
What is supposed to be this species was first described by Asa Fitch in his “Catalogueof the Homoptera of New York†in 1851 as Aphis betulA¦colens . Monell described it from Missouri as Callipterus betulA¦colens , n. sp., and placed Aphis betulA¦colens of Fitch as doubtfully synonymous. Thomas hesitatingly placed this species and Calaphis betulella as Callipterus betulA¦ of Koch, but there is little doubt that all three are distinct species. Oestlund redescribed the winged viviparous female, from specimens collected in Minnesota, as C. betulA¦colens (Fitch), and gave C. betulA¦colens' of Monnell as synoynmous. It has been further reported in the literature by Miss Edith M. Patch from Maine, and by W. T. Clarke from California.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts