<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Aesthetic and Non‐Aesthetic

Name: Aesthetic and Non‐Aesthetic
Creator: Frank Sibley
Keywords: 5. Gender equality, 16. Peace & justice, 7. Clean energy, 12. Responsible consumption

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Article 01 Apr 1965 English Publisher:Oxford University PressOxfordJournal:The Philosophical Review, volume 74, page 135 (issn: 0031-8108,

Authors: Frank Sibley;

doi: 10.1093/0198238991.003.0003 , 10.2307/2183262

Aesthetic and Non‐Aesthetic

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

Abstract Sibley distinguishes aesthetic judgements, non-aesthetic judgements, and verdicts. Verdicts are purely evaluative, while the (initially intuitive) distinction between aesthetic and non-aesthetic judgements demarcates, barring expected borderline cases, the subject matter of aesthetics. Chapter 3 is concerned with illuminating this distinction, by outlining how aesthetic judgements are made, justified, and explained. Sibley further disentangles the various, conceptual and contingent, relations and dependences of aesthetic and non-aesthetic judgements, concluding that the truth of aesthetic judgements cannot be verified, confirmed, or supported mechanically or by appeal to rules.

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	147
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average