Quantum cohomology: is it still relevant?
Copyright policy )Quantum cohomology: is it still relevant?
This article, intended for a general mathematical audience, is an informal review of some of the many interesting links which have developed between quantum cohomology and “classical” mathematics. It is based on a talk given at the Autumn Meeting of the Mathematical Society of Japan in September 2021.
- Waseda University Japan
Mathematics - Differential Geometry, High Energy Physics - Theory, quantum cohomology, ストークスデータ, Stokes data, FOS: Physical sciences, 53D45, 35Q15, 22E67, tt<sup>*</sup>-equations, 量子コホモロジー, tt<sup>*</sup>方程式, Differential Geometry (math.DG), High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th), Gromov-Witten invariants, quantum cohomology, Frobenius manifolds, FOS: Mathematics
Mathematics - Differential Geometry, High Energy Physics - Theory, quantum cohomology, ストークスデータ, Stokes data, FOS: Physical sciences, 53D45, 35Q15, 22E67, tt<sup>*</sup>-equations, 量子コホモロジー, tt<sup>*</sup>方程式, Differential Geometry (math.DG), High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th), Gromov-Witten invariants, quantum cohomology, Frobenius manifolds, FOS: Mathematics
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!