<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
We consider a number of uniqueness questions for several wide classes of active scalar equations, unifying and generalizing the techniques of several authors. As special cases of our results, we provide a significantly simplified proof to the known uniqueness result for the 2D Euler equations in L 1 ∩ B M O L^1 \cap BMO and provide a mild improvement to the recent results of Rusin for the 2D inviscid surface quasi-geostrophic (SQG) equations, which are now to our knowledge the best results known for this model. We also obtain what are (to our knowledge) the strongest known uniqueness results for the Patlak-Keller-Segel models with nonlinear diffusion. We obtain these results via technical refinements of energy methods which are well-known in the L 2 L^2 setting but are less well-known in the H ˙ − 1 \dot {H}^{-1} setting. The H ˙ − 1 \dot {H}^{-1} method can be considered a generalization of Yudovich’s classical method and is naturally applied to equations such as the Patlak-Keller-Segel models with nonlinear diffusion and other variants. Important points of our analysis are an L p L^p - B M O BMO interpolation lemma and a Sobolev embedding lemma which shows that velocity fields v v with ∇ v ∈ B M O \nabla v \in BMO are locally log-Lipschitz; the latter is known in harmonic analysis but does not seem to have been connected to this setting.
Mathematics - Analysis of PDEs, FOS: Mathematics, Analysis of PDEs (math.AP)
Mathematics - Analysis of PDEs, FOS: Mathematics, Analysis of PDEs (math.AP)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |