
handle: 11336/8253
Let H h \mathcal {H}^h be the h h -dimensional Hausdorff measure on R d \mathbb {R}^d . Besicovitch showed that if a set E E is null for H h \mathcal {H}^h , then it is null for H g \mathcal {H}^g , for some dimension g g smaller than h h . We prove that this is not true for packing measures. Moreover, we consider the corresponding questions for sets of non- σ \sigma -finite packing measure and for pre-packing measure instead of packing measure.
28A78, 28A80, Mathematics - Classical Analysis and ODEs, Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA), FOS: Mathematics, Packing Measure, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.1, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
28A78, 28A80, Mathematics - Classical Analysis and ODEs, Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA), FOS: Mathematics, Packing Measure, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.1, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
