
doi: 10.1090/proc/13337
We present various inequalities for the complete elliptic integral of the first kind, \[ K ( r ) = ∫ 0 π / 2 1 1 − r 2 sin 2 ( t ) d t ( 0 > r > 1 ) . \mathcal {K}(r)=\int _0^{\pi /2} \frac {1}{\sqrt {1- r ^2\sin ^2(t)}}dt \quad {(0>r>1)}. \] Among others, we prove that the inequalities \[ 1 1 + 1 4 r > K ( r ) K ( r ) and K ( 1 − r 2 ) K ( 1 − r ) > 2 1 + r \frac {1}{1+\frac {1}{4}r}>\frac {\mathcal {K}(r)}{\mathcal {K}(\sqrt {r})} \quad \mbox {and} \quad { \frac {\mathcal {K}(\sqrt {1-r^2})}{\mathcal {K}(\sqrt {1-r})}>\frac {2}{1+\sqrt {r}}} \] are valid for all r ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) r\in (0,1) . These estimates refine results published by Anderson, Vamanamurthy, and Vuorinen in 1990.
Elliptic integrals as hypergeometric functions, functional inequalities, means, Functional inequalities, including subadditivity, convexity, etc., complete elliptic integrals, Means
Elliptic integrals as hypergeometric functions, functional inequalities, means, Functional inequalities, including subadditivity, convexity, etc., complete elliptic integrals, Means
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
