Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Telemedicine Journal...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
License: Mary Ann Liebert TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Generational Differences in Acceptance of Technology

Authors: Jose A, Loera;

Generational Differences in Acceptance of Technology

Abstract

The twofold purpose of this study was to first determine if telemedicine would offer a time efficient use of faculty mentoring of students performing traditional history and physical examinations on elders residing in an independent living facility (ILF). The second purpose was to determine if differences exist between the two groups' perceptions of technology: from telemedicine to cell phones. Two groups consisting of two generations participated in a telemedicine distance mentoring study. One group included 25 elderly residing in an independent living facility (group 1). The second group was comprised of 25 physician assistant program (PA) students (group 2). Group 1 recognized the convenience telemedicine offered for easier access to doctors. Group 2 recognized that telemedicine could potentially improve time efficiency of their practice. Both groups were generally unaware and uninformed about the technological devices commonly used by the opposite group. Group 1 used technological devices for improving basic sensory, balance, and gait disorders as well as contributing to a sense of safety and security, whereas group 2 mostly utilized telecommunications technology. Both groups acquired knowledge of technological innovations that have a direct effect on their lives and both groups shared the same perceptions of telemedicine's positive influence on improving access to healthcare services both for users as well as providers.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Students, Medical, Mentors, Age Factors, Self-Help Devices, Residential Facilities, Telemedicine, Young Adult, Physician Assistants, Attitude, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Diffusion of Innovation, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!