
pmid: 15735380
To evaluate the use of virtual endoscopy (VE) for the investigation of the pelvicaliceal unit and the depiction of its anatomic deformities.Two study groups were prospectively enrolled in our protocol: ten patients with nonurologic pathologies, and thus without any known deformity of the pelvicaliceal unit (group A), and five patients with caliceal obstruction (group B). Virtual endoscopy represented a non-invasive technique providing amplification of the image in three-dimensional space.Virtual endoscopy was feasible in all patients, and in all cases succeeded in demonstrating the threedimensional morphology of the region of interest. The entire processing time ranged from 10 to 15 minutes (mean 12.6 minutes), and the three-dimensional image could be viewed from different angles, allowing better evaluation of the collecting system and its deformities than is possible with conventional intravenous urography or percutaneous nephrostomography.Virtual endoscopy enabled the creation of endoluminal views of the renal pelvis and calices from spiral tomographic images, thereby allowing diagnostic-preoperative and postoperative evaluation of the pelvicaliceal unit.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Kidney Calices, User-Computer Interface, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Aged, Ureteral Obstruction
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Kidney Calices, User-Computer Interface, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Aged, Ureteral Obstruction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
