
The amount and rate of phenotypic change at ecological timescales varies widely, but there has not been a comprehensive quantitative synthesis of the patterns and causes of such variation for plants. Present knowledge is based predominantly on animals, whose differences with plants in the origin of germ cells and the level of modularity (among others) could make it invalid for plants. We synthesized data on contemporary phenotypic responses of angiosperms to environmental change and show that if extinction does not occur, quantitative traits change quickly in the first few years following the environmental novelty and then remain stable. This general pattern is independent from life span, growth form, spatial scale, or the type of trait. Our work shows that high amounts and rates of phenotypic change at contemporary timescales observed in plants are consistent with the pattern of stasis and bounded evolution previously observed over longer time frames. We also found evidence that may contradict some common ideas about phenotypic evolution: (1) the total amount of phenotypic change observed does not differ significantly according to growth form or life span; (2) greater and faster divergence tends to occur between populations connected at the local scale, where gene flow could be intense, rather than between distant populations; and (3) traits closely related to fitness change as much and as fast as other traits.
Gene Flow, PHENOTYPIC CHANGE, Adaptation, Biological, PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION, Adaptation, Physiological, Biological Evolution, Time, Magnoliopsida, DARWINS, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, CONTEMPORARY EVOLUTION, PLANTS, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, HALDANES
Gene Flow, PHENOTYPIC CHANGE, Adaptation, Biological, PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION, Adaptation, Physiological, Biological Evolution, Time, Magnoliopsida, DARWINS, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, CONTEMPORARY EVOLUTION, PLANTS, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, HALDANES
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
