
doi: 10.1086/663196 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.94291.v1 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.94291 , 10.48550/arxiv.1102.2634
pmid: 22173467
arXiv: 1102.2634
doi: 10.1086/663196 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.94291.v1 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.94291 , 10.48550/arxiv.1102.2634
pmid: 22173467
arXiv: 1102.2634
The American Naturalist, Vol. 179, No. 1 (January 2012), pp. 137-144. DOI: 10.1086/663196. abstract: Patterns of biodiversity predicted by the neutral theory rely on a simple phenomenological model of speciation. To further investigate the effect of speciation on neutral biodiversity, we analyze a spatially explicit neutral model based on population genetics. We define the metacommunity as a system of populations exchanging migrants, and we use this framework to introduce speciation with little or no gene flow (allopatric and parapatric speciation). We find that with realistic mutation rates, our metacommunity model driven by neutral processes cannot support more than a few species. Adding natural selection in the population genetics of speciation increases the number of species in the metacommunity, but the level of diversity found in the Barro Colorado Island is difficult to reach.
Gene Flow, Genetic Speciation, Panama, Population Dynamics, Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE), Biodiversity, Models, Biological, FOS: Biological sciences, Selection, Genetic, Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution
Gene Flow, Genetic Speciation, Panama, Population Dynamics, Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE), Biodiversity, Models, Biological, FOS: Biological sciences, Selection, Genetic, Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
