
doi: 10.1086/657261
AbstractMartin Bylica became the favorite court astrologer to the Hungarian king Matthias Corvinus in 1468 and then enjoyed royal patronage throughout the remainder of Corvinus’s reign. Initially, Bylica’s success at the Corvinian court was based on his performance before the Hungarian diet, where he used an astrolabe to solve a technical astrological problem: rectifying a natal horoscope. Once he had gained the king’s patronage, Bylica solidified his position at court by emphasizing the various layers of his astrological expertise—academic credentials, personal experience, the use of instruments, and his collection of horoscopes. Bylica’s expertise was based not on privileged access to the natural world, but on his ability to offer expert interpretations of that world. Because of his success, Bylica’s career at Corvinus’s court also reveals how the king distinguished between competing claims to astrological expertise and the place of that expertise in his political program.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
