Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Thirty-Three Paroled Boys: A Survey and Conclusions

Authors: Dwight H. Ferguson;

Thirty-Three Paroled Boys: A Survey and Conclusions

Abstract

THE usual procedure for the care of boys who have completed a period of training in a correctional institution is for them to be paroled. In Illinois they are paroled from the St. Charles School for Boys to state parole officers, whose chief responsibility is working with adult offenders. The director of the Department of Public Welfare in Illinois temporarily changed this procedure by requesting that the Foster-Home Placement Department of the St. Charles School take over the supervision of paroled boys in the immediate vicinity of the school. Under this arrangement the Foster-Home Placement Department assumed responsibility from May 20 to July 24, 1937, for thirty-three paroled boys — an addition to the regular placement work of the department. During this limited period of supervision, each boy was visited once, with the exception of two who could not be located, and in some cases where the problems seemed particularly urgent two or three visits were made. The workers talked with the foster-parents and boys separately, and in most instances neighbors or some independent references were visited. There was not sufficient time to make a complete study of each boy's case, so only the more obvious facts are reported here. 1 These facts are divided into three general divisions: first, with the boys' histories before coming to the St. Charles School as recorded at the school; second, the boys' programs at the school; and, third, the boys' placement experiences and present problems following his school training. It is felt that the group of thirty-three boys under supervision is a fairly representative sample of all the boys committed to the St. Charles School, as the only limiting factor in the selection of these boys is that they have been paroled to some home in the immediate vicinity of the school. They have probably, therefore, received more

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!