
doi: 10.1086/496822
As objects from China and Japan made their way into American collections during the nineteenth century, museums faced the categorical problem of how best to classify and display them. For some, these objects belonged in the category of "fine art"; for others, they belonged more properly in the category of anthropology or ethnology. By the 1920s, this debate had largely been resolved in favor of "art." At stake, of course, was the larger question of how Americans would ultimately view the cultures that produced the objects.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
