
doi: 10.1086/493709
If it seemed in 1974 that the women's movement had introduced "possibilities for profound changes both in the way in which the discipline studies women and the way in which it defines 'political' activity," five years later there is little evidence that these possibilities have been realized or, indeed, even pursued.1 The hopeful, if cautious, tone of earlier reviewers now seems largely premature, and their efforts to delineate the kinds of research and theoretical development needed appear to have fallen on deaf ears.2
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
