
doi: 10.1086/486773
Though it is often recognized that Schleiermacher developed a sensitivity to divergent modes of religious expression and thereby helped pave the way for appreciative studies of non-Christian religious traditions, his treatment of Judaism appears harsh and insensitive. Jewish historians discuss his position warily, ranging from grudging appreciation to condemnation.' Christian interpreters seem not to discuss his treatment of Judaism at all, or merely as footnotes to other issues.2
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
